minor children? Why would the police be trying to help the informant? Why would everyone
ignore the other parent, and listen to the informant? Should judges in family court give criminals the minor children?
If you didn't know before, apparently in this county one can be a snitch and then get treated like he's the greatest guy on earth. Why? Because obviously, he has done enough snitching such that the police, the District Attorneys, investigators and even the Judges in family law courts, will GIVE him custody??? and what of the kids? Apparently it doesn't matter if you give minor kids to criminals on purpose. Even if the kids have an attorney appointed to help them (also known as minor's counsel..)
From what we have seen, in informant cases, minor's counsel may not be much help? Or maybe
that's because he or she already knows that an informant will be given preference? Just guessing?
WARNING-- very little is written on family law cases where one parent is or was
a confidential informant. These cases will nearly always be very difficult, because the
snitch will likely be given preference over the other parent depending on how much
leeway is owed to the snitch.
Bad parent may have:
Huge criminal history, jail, prison, VOP, you name it
Violation of nearly all parental ethics
Allowed to engage in child endangerment, slam into a vehicle 7 times with
his own vehicle, with other parent/minor kids in it, and may not be charged?
Close to kidnapping, (or actual) and withheld visitation for months on and off
Lying nearly 100% of the time, no matter what subject
Used fraud and failed to properly give notice, but the Intent to Withhold Unit
just allows it, unfettered
Used kids as pawns and secretly grooming kids in bad ways
Was able to LIE to all JUDGES
Always able to get perpetual "intent to withhold" and when they expire, do nothing
and keep the kids?
Because both federal and state government allow criminals to work for
them as snitches, much has been written about the practice, and the pitfalls that occur.