Attorney realizes that other attorneys can offer "free" consultations, or can conversely charge you $250+ up front, just to listen to your problems/issues at hand.
Attorney herein will charge you $75.00 for a consultation, BUT you will get $225 of legal time credit on your case if you decide to hire attorney. So essentially, you get a consultation for free PLUS you still get $175.00 of legal work.... at no cost!!
Do the math. After nearly 25 years of working in family law, plus civil cases and even criminal law and animal law cases, very few attorneys have experience like this. [Animal law may involve all of these types of law, so not surprisingly, most attorneys don't know much about animal law or cases on animal laws.] Attorney will be helping to work on a big federal case in Eastern District Federal Court, Sacramento, on 4th Amendment issues soon. The lead attorney from Roseville, specializes in federal litigation, and has represented or defended towns, cities (Oroville, Paradise,etc.) and police entities. Attorney herein believes the case to be precedent setting, especially within the realm of animal law codified in the CA Penal Code, where due process appears to be ignored [as applied] upon a literal reading of the statute.
Attorney has much experience in both extreme cases, novel issues, and downright complicated issues. Also, attorney has formerly been in shared law offices with Special Master, immigration, worker's comp, personal injury, bankruptcy, and more. If you want to or need to win your case, contact attorney right away. We can do this!
Tuesday, June 20, 2017
Thursday, June 8, 2017
If you find your child appears overdependent on technology devices or Internet sites--you are likely correct...........for example-- see link below--very relevant and informative........
Technology addiction: high-level definition
“Technology addiction” can be broadly defined as an inability to control one’s technology use due to a dependence developed through emotional, psychological, social, environmental, and biological factors. This means that an individual may have difficulty with impulse control when it comes to technology usage, be it the internet, gaming, texting, smartphones, social media, or otherwise.
The above definition is purposefully broad to align “technology addiction” with the more general definition of addiction as provided by the American Psychological Association(APA). The APA defines addiction as: “a chronic disorder with biological, psychological, social and environmental factors influencing its development and maintenance.”
((There is more to the test, see link..this is just the first part of test...))
Do you have a technology addiction?
Rate each item on a scale of 1 (“completely disagree”) to 7 (“strongly agree”) and tally up your total score to find out. Be honest!
- I would feel uncomfortable without constant access to information through my smartphone.
- I would be annoyed if I could not look information up on my smartphone when I wanted to do so.
- Being unable to get the news (e.g., happenings, weather, etc.) on my smartphone would make me nervous.
- I would be annoyed if I could not use my smartphone and/or its capabilities when I wanted to do so.
- Running out of battery in my smartphone would scare me.
- If I were to run out of credits or hit my monthly data limit, I would panic.
- If I did not have a data signal or could not connect to Wi-Fi, then I would constantly check to see if I had a signal or could find a Wi-Fi network.
- If I could not use my smartphone, I would be afraid of getting stranded somewhere.
- If I could not check my smartphone for a while, I would feel a desire to check it.
NOTE BY ATTORNEY OF THIS FAMILY LAW BLOG:
In addition, PARENTS that allow their children to over-engage in various technology-related issues could be partially at fault, since the legal custody of children involves the health/welfare of the child.
Thursday, June 1, 2017
Lawyer is disbarred for 'social media blitz' intended to influence custody case and top state courthttp://www.abajournal.com/news/article/lawyer_is_disbarred_for_social_media_blitz_intended_to_influence_custody
POSTED JUL 08, 2015
BY DEBRA CASSENS WEISS
A divided Louisiana Supreme Court has disbarred a lawyer who used Twitter and an online petition to urge readers to contact two judges she accused of being unwilling to consider the evidence in two custody cases involving allegations of child sexual abuse.
The supreme court disbarred 52-year-old lawyer Joyce Nanine McCool in a June 30 opinion (PDF), noted by the Legal Profession Blog. A hearing board and the disciplinary board had recommended a suspension of a year and a day, but the four-justice majority on the state supreme court said disbarment was warranted. Three dissenters would have imposed lesser discipline.
The majority opinion said McCook displayed an “utter lack of remorse” and a “defiant attitude” by asserting her actions had First Amendment protection.
According to the court, McCool’s social media postings contained many “false, misleading and inflammatory statements” about the way two judges were handling the cases. Among the untrue statements were assertions that judges had refused to admit audio recordings of children talking about alleged abuse, although the recordings were not offered into evidence at that time.
The court also said McCool had solicited others to make ex parte contact with the judges—and with the state supreme court—to express their feelings about the cases, which were sealed domestic proceedings.
The court cited several examples of McCool’s advocacy, including this tweet: “GIMME GIMME GIMME Evidence! Want some? I got it. Think u can convince a judge to look at it? Sign this petition.”
Another example was this blurb: “Please sign the petition, circulate it to all of your friends and families and call Judge Amacker and Judge Gambrell during the hours of 8:30 to 5:00 starting Monday, August 15 to ask why they won’t follow the law and protect these children. Let them know you’re watching and expect them to do their job and most of all, make sure these precious little girls are safe!”
McCool had claimed her actions were protected by the First Amendment, but the argument didn’t persuade the supreme court majority. “We disagree and take strong exception to respondent’s artful attempt to use the First Amendment as a shield against her clearly and convincingly proven ethical misconduct,” the court said.
“The appropriate method for challenging a judge’s decisions and evidentiary rulings, as respondent even conceded, is through the writ and appeal process, not by starting a social media blitz to influence the judges’ and this court’s rulings in pending matters and then claiming immunity from discipline through the First Amendment.”
McCool told the ABA Journal in February, after the disciplinary board recommended a suspension, that she “was willing to stand up to two judges who ignored the law. … I thought that was what our oath demanded of us and it is why I became an attorney.”
The suspension recommendation, she said at the time, doesn’t do “anything to protect the profession or make it more ‘honorable.’ ”
Chico Family Law Lawyers - Compare Top Family ... - Justia
www.justia.com › Lawyer Directory › Family Law › California
Compare 18 family law attorneys serving Chico, California on Justia. Comprehensive profiles including fees, education, jurisdictions, awards, publications and ...