Friday, August 31, 2018

Thank You all for Your Trust!!!

Attorney would like to thank all of the many people  who inquire about possible representation....  , unique fact pattern, or cross over issues, or some other complicated situations in the case (possibly involving breach of fiduciary duty, criminal issues, emergency ex parte, bankruptcy filing or other areas of law...)  usually take time to assess properly...so if I have not been able to answer your inquiry, I apologize !

Image result for pic of trial attorney using exhibit

 I use a computer tracking system that logs calls with times and dates but if no message is left, I usually do not call the number back due to time restraints.
But, for example, if someone referred a case to me, I usually would like to know who that person was so I could thank that person?  and I normally ask clients how they found me (online, friend, etc.) 

I am grateful for the opportunity to provide services to clients, and I seldom go on vacations. The last time I went to the movies was in 1998?  Apparently I am too happy working, especially after a caller told me that some law firm in another county recommended me and I don't know that law firm?  LOL  It really doesn't matter, my job is to provide service to others !


Tuesday, August 28, 2018

Is Your Family LegaI Issue Listed Below?

Although the Jerry Springer show on TV  is exaggerated, it pretty much sums up the general family law nature of the bad cases that we will see.

https://tinyurl.com/ydg6z52f    (to view business with reviews/other posts)


           If your issue is not listed below, call 

                     Attorney C. Chan                                      ….  (530) 359-8810


Community Property that Spouse Claims isn’t Community
Contempt of court- Can you get a free attorney?

Credits:  Do you have any coming to you or will you Pay Out?
Child Support — who really gets screwed over?

Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
Child Illegally moved out of the state?

DCSS (Dept. Child Support Services) When is it a good idea?
Denied Visitation?

Supervised Visits Required?
DNA Testing–Should you bother and is there a good reason?

Division of Business Assets or Business
Division of Non-Listed Property that One Spouse Lied About

Divorce on Paper
Divorce with Property Issues

Domestic Violence, Including TRO DV or CPO or Criminal issues
Ex Parte Restraining Orders –Do you need or should you get?

Fathers Who are Getting Shafted or Run Over
Fathers who are doing OK but Mother claims not the case
Fighting Over Visitation–percentages and calculation

Forensics–Do you need an actual expert on the business?
Forensic Accounting–Do you need it because your spouse has lied?

Guardianship [Attorney does not do dependency or guardianship cases]

Imputing Income when You don’t even have a job
Income–Do you have a regular wage or self employed–does it matter?

Legal and Physical Custody–Do I really need to know?
Military Problems Including Orders, Not Paying, Arrears

Mothers Who are Overbearing..or Fathers!
Mothers Who Do Too Little but Claim They are Wonderful, but Are not! 
Fathers who claim they do Everything but the kids are ruined?

Medical conditions of one parent– does it mean you can’t have visitation?

Medical Issues– is your child already a special needs child?

Move Away and Why You Might and Might Not Win–advance preparation required

Medications–can you alone force kids to NOT take them?
Mediation  (good, bad, ugly) a lot of it is ugly—yes

Parentage– When is it too late once you are on the hook as the Presumed Father?

Parents on Drugs- Illegal Drugs–or even legal drugs
Parents with  Over Consumption of Alcohol

Parents driving the kids while drinking heavily
Parent(s) passed out in public place, CPS takes kids

Parents on Anti-anxiety Drugs, Marijuana, or Others–Can it affect YOUR timeshare?

Parents with Criminal record charges, arrests, DV TRO backgrounds?
Personal Property– Was it already yours but spouse says NO?
Private Mediation--Is it worth it?

New Boyfriend or Girlfriend Issues
Ongoing spousal support vs temporary—big difference!!

Failing to plan for spousal support ramifications in future
Parental Alienation over Kids, new wife issues

Paying for Kids that are not Your kids?
Real Estate Separate Property When Under Water—-HUGE ISSUE !!!!

School issues—bullying, intimidation, physical harm

Teacher at grade school– issues with proper teacher conduct
Separate Property– Is it Really Separate or is it just Commingled?

Spousal support –are you entitled?
Title to Property–is it Disputed, Proven, or Subject to Division?

Timeshare– Do you really Want more time, or just want to pay Less?

Unsafe Daycare
Visitation–do you need more time or less?

Welfare– Does the other parent get it and how it affects your payments?

Working Under the Table– Can you prove it?
Winning your case—– Do you want to and why?

Win Your Case

To win each case, each set of facts will be different in nearly every case, however the laws that apply will likely be the same ones, since most of what we do is governed by the CA Family Code and other codes that could come up (drugs, animals, criminals,driving,stalking,etc.) 
Attorney has been involved over the years with family law cases in large cities, even when working part time. There is very little that attorney has not seen; she has been on TV, in newspapers, and in the news years ago for different cases. Most people want an affordable attorney, which is hard to find. Ms. Chan is likely the most affordable in the county, with the highest win rate, especially in the law and motion hearings and the domestic violence cases.
Many cases in family law whether they are in Northern Cal or Southern Cal, should be reasonably the same, the local courts may have their own local rules but basically the CA Family Law Code statewide does apply. Generally, law and motion calendars are about 15-20 minutes and then in some counties long cause case cases are considered “trial.” Trial can be half a day, full day, or many days....

The Beginning of the End

It’s Never Easy…………….

We saw the above quote thrown in with a bunch of quotes by women who advertise for divorce parties, divorce cakes, and the like. But unfortunately, it is obvious that the quote was likely written by a male and not a female?


.....UNFORTUNATELY FROM  ATTORNEY'S EXPERIENCE, IT'S NOT THAT FAR OFF, ESPECIALLY IF WE ARE WORKING WITH ANXIETY PRONE PEOPLE....... and yes, such anxiety can arise from most family law issues....

Wednesday, August 22, 2018

What Not to Do in Court or at Hearings and Trial

1. Don't roll your eyes, or make faces or start talking out of turn. If you are on the stand as a witness, answer the question keeping in mind the process your attorney explained to you beforehand. Blurting out harmful things can ruin a case. 
2. Don't  keep referring to your child as “my” son or “my” daughter. It usually takes two to make a child, and possibly one to wreck the child.
3. Do not hide embarrassing or foolish acts that the other side will use against you, whether it's on Facebook, Internet, or spouse's friends know already..tell attorney beforehand, just in case..

4. Don’t bring your entire extended family and ten of your closest friends to your divorce hearing. This is not a circus!  (Circuses are fading since animal activists want no animals to perform, not even in movies or rodeos!)
5. Don’t wear inappropriate clothing such as see-thru blouses, short skirts,nightclub wear, low cut blouse or shirt, sandals or flip flops, Ugg boots, beachwear, dresses that belong at a party, big over the top jewelry, super heavy eye makeup or glitter, neon colors, super spiked party heels, bra straps showing through shirt or tank tops, super ratted hair that makes you look like TV girls, pink, green or blue hair, or rainbow hair (dyed or woven in), ripped jeans,or weirdo outfits that anyone knows is not kosher for courtrooms! Conservative clothing/colors are safe. If in doubt ask your attorney.  It's safer to look like a conservative Mom from the 1950's if need be. Just don't wear the 1950's costume or Judge will think you are on drugs.
  NO, NO, NO!!!!
NO, NO, NO...!!!

6. Do not make up crap that never happened or that you never told your attorney and expect your attorney to defend it?  E.V.E.R. Tell your attorney ahead of time!!
7. Don’t show hostility or open anger at opposing counsel. Ignore him or her; if necessary, write small note to your own attorney if it's a lie you're mad about. Opposing counsel already knows you hate him or her.
8. Don’t have your cell phone "ON". Ever!
9. In a child custody/or visitation issue , don’t keep talking about “your” needs and “your” desires. You will appear overly selfish and controlling. Even if you are selfish and controlling, you don't have to tell others!
10. Don’t tell long stories, or mention long incidents that are not at issue. If you have such a long issue, attorney must know ahead of time to gauge how long trial will take.
11. Preferably, do not wear colors that are known colors for certain gangs in your area. Ask your friends if you do not know what this means. We tend to see this issue in the juvenile courts but not always.
PS-- even if you don't HAVE an attorney, all of these above will apply. If you have some common sense and are not on drugs which are mind altering, and you are not on disability, most people can follow the above advice.
If all else fails, at least read what this guy wrote..it makes sense and it might just bring you down to earth... https://markmanson.net/stupid-things  Attorney herein actually thinks that it would help people in general --if they thought long enough to try it out.  Social media can be damaging to children. That has already been proven.

Tuesday, August 21, 2018

Do You Want to Win Your Case? Should You Hire a Litigator? Do You Care?

What Type of Attorney do You Really Need? Do You Want to Win? You Don't Care?

Do you have a case where you want to win, or need to win your case?
Do you have the winning facts?  Do you know what law would or would not support your position? Do you want or need an actual litigator for your case?

Hiring an advocate (attorney litigator) is not the same as hiring collaborative attorneys. Also, mediating* a case with only one attorney means ...The mediator helps people talk the issues through, supposedly helping to "settle" the dispute themselves. In this attorney's opinion, it would not be recommended in most cases, because typically the overbearing spouse simply bulldozes the other spouse.

*[Mediation for visitation is not the same thing as mediation of an entire divorce case. Mediation for visitation/custody is required by law in CA when there is no agreement.]

There are many pitfalls that can arise in divorce; many of them involve financial transactions that one spouse had no knowledge of; assets that one spouse did not know about; children that were conceived outside the marriage and spouse never knew other spouse was paying; secret business dealings that was predicated on all cash; illegal actions by one spouse implicating the other spouse who had no knowledge; large debts racked up by one spouse, without the other spouse even knowing such debt existed; one spouse signing the other spouse's name for a credit card, then ruining the other spouse's credit.... NONE of these things, in this attorney's opinion, should be addressed in either mediation or collaborative law scenario.

That is because there was a huge breach of fiduciary duty that has serious consequences to the guilty spouse. That should be done in court since the guilty spouse should have to pay for wrongdoing. (Of course if you are too afraid because your spouse might try and kill you then you better go get help right away.)

Especially if you have issues in the 3 lines below, which happened BEFORE the case finalized---- you should never hire anyone except an advocate litigator. Aggressive at that. Plus, there are huge time barriers to trying to set aside any of this!

Fraud, Duress
Mistake, Coercion,
Failure to Exchange Declarations (Assets Debts)

We live in a society where people often want what they want, and when clients hire attorneys to get something done, especially in family law, it's often because one SIDE tried to take advantage of the other side.  If you have a family law case where both of you AGREE on everything then of course you don't really need an attorney, except perhaps to create a settlement agreement.

HOWEVER, the vast majority of most divorces and break ups, are because the couple cannot agree on a lot of things, including (just an example....) post judgment orders.........

How to raise the kids-- too lenient?  too strict?
How to spend income from employment or inheritance
How to train kids  to have moral values
How to get along with other family members that don't live with you
How to avoid too much tv, too much bad influence, too much Facebook?
What to do with a lazy spouse that refuses to help out--with anything?
What to do with spouse that is either dangerous, aggressive, drinks too much
How to get out of supervised visits?? You have an ex spouse also?
Spouse drinks, smokes, gambles, does drugs, shops too much? Hoarding?
Spouse AND kids do nothing but stay on Facebook and phone 24/7??
Your kids are not only lazy, they are spoiled rotten and you blame the spouse?
Your spouse is bipolar and can't be controlled?

Of all the problems attorney has seen over several decades, the problems around children tend to generate the worst issues, followed by physical harm, financial issues, and alcohol or drug use.

And remarkably, attorney has seen clients REFUSE to take what he/she is entitled to, and then SETTLE a case by using an attorney who ONLY settles cases--- in other words, the attorney is not a litigator. That is absurd.  

If you are entitled to something, why would you pay someone to settle a case when you could have settled it without help????   Collaborative law and mediation means if you don't settle the case using whomever you hired, those attorneys cannot represent you in court anyway.

You THEN have to hire new attorneys!!  

While mediation and collaborative may be good for some cases (which means you are settling case by paying people to settle it without court)-- it is essentially negotiation. Judges are not involved. If you work something out and then don't like it later--- what you have -- is a problem.

              Some of the down sides of  collaborative law (which includes hiring people like accountants and other experts) and which makes it costly:

The Expense; Impact of termination and cost of new counsel; No advocacy for one or both parties; directed conversation between parties, power imbalances, difficult issues might remain secret (such as domestic violence, addictions, drugs, gambling, infidelities,etc.); Possible inadequate information collection, potentially less support for views of children.

Basically, in mediation there is no advocate for YOU.
In collaborative law, BOTH sides work on issues, but NO ONE is an advocate for YOUR side.
The collaborative view is to work out issues, not really take sides as an advocate----a true advocate is there to represent YOU, not the spouse.

This is part of the reason that most people in a divorce WANT an advocate, and need a litigator --- because they are being taken advantage of, steamrolled, or being misled or manipulated.

Sunday, August 19, 2018

Winning Doesn't Matter??


People, don't fool yourselves. Some litigation doesn't require the emotional toll
as much as others do. Money issues are bad, and custody is much worse. IN fact
custody is probably the worst hands down.

The real question is, would you want to hire an attorney to  lose your case?     

Most people love to say that "family law" means there are no winners.

Attorney herein is not your run of the mill attorney...some things that other attorneys
think are critical to practicing law, really aren't all that critical.

Well, maybe the people saying that, that there are "no winners" don't win any cases,
 or feel that families all lose  everything, or something different.
 Because there is no pat set of facts that create
 winning, it's obvious that if someone needs child support and gets the order, it's a win
 because they got what they requested?  If they got nothing, they certainly can't say
 they won, in our opinion.

Image result for photos winning in court

Look at this, which we saw online:   ..."clients will want to find in an attorney, someone who is competent, communicative and diligent versus seeking out a win loss record..a win loss record is rarely a good measure in divorce and family law...."

For some attorneys, maybe claiming a win loss record may not be a good measure of anything, but after many years of doing these cases, attorney herein believes that if a client desires an outcome, and attorney gets that outcome, that is a win for the client.  

If the attorney just wants to settle a case, that is an outcome, possibly it could be acceptable to both sides if each had to give up something, then it's a compromise.  Whether a compromise is a loss or win is usually up to the circumstances-- if a client had to really lose a lot in order to get the compromise, but overall in the long run it would be helpful down the road, that might be sort of a win over the long haul.

But telling people that a win loss record is not a good measure of a family law attorney is not necessarily correct, since any family law attorney that consistently loses cases is likely not doing something correctly.  Family law is much more difficult than it appears, and the emotional aspects alone make most attorneys run, run, run--away!! When compounded by clients with high anxiety  and medical or mental issues, the case becomes at least twice as difficult--- if not more.....

 The high emotional toll on the parties and even the attorneys means that certain attorneys could never, and would never, never, ever want to be in family law.

It is a fact that it was due to family law related cases, where the emotions tend to run higher
 than even in criminal cases-- that California started using weapon scanning to enter courthouses.  We know of several family law attorneys that were shot by the losing spouses in family law cases?    

If clients want to win their case, it should at least be for the right reasons. Calling the right reasons is half the battle, yet some attorneys simply churn out the work to get paid, which is their reason, not necessarily the client's ....that's a huge difference. 
So attorney herein has no problems in stating that attorney is hired to win whatever the client wants, as long as attorney believes that under the law, that outcome is suitable. 

Attorney has had cases where the outcome is NOT suitable nor equitable, BUT the client
wants to take that choice. A bad decision, a bad choice, or a bad moment (lapse of reason) in
family law can cause clients to ignore the attorney and make poor choices. When I see a client
willing to cut their throat to end the case, I do not allow it because I know it will haunt the
client forever.

These are serious mistakes, and instead, I will have the client fire me and sign
the substitution of attorney. I will take no part in a bad, horrible decision made due to mental
anguish or the ability to do harm to him or herself.

For example: client made $25k/year and
spouse made $80k/year. The $80k spouse had spent over 100k on credit cards the other spouse
did not even know existed, putting them into bankruptcy. The family was forcing the $27k
person to take a walk-away deal with almost nothing. Attorney herein refused to do it, and would
not sign anything of the sort, regardless.  They were FAR from being poor.

In another case, the wife wanted the divorce judgment BEFORE the bankruptcy rules had changed. At that time, the bankruptcy rules were such that if a spouse got divorced, the community debt would
fall to the non filing spouse (post separation) and the filing spouse would have no debt.

That law had not been changed and I repeatedly explained to client that if she entered the judgment, she would then end up with all of the community debt (that the husband had racked up) and with her
student debt of $70k she would end up being  a bankruptcy candidate.

She claimed she did not care, but as the judgment triggers the law, she should have cared. I told her to fire me and get another attorney so she wouldn't have to be charged for me to make a motion to get out of the case. Instead, she complained to the bar that I wouldn't file the judgment? This is how errant clients can become. If her ex filed the bankruptcy and the law hadn't changed, then she inherited the debt.
That would be an interesting question whether, if she inherited the debt and didn't file bankruptcy herself, whether she could get out of that later when the law changed. I suppose if there was some type of look back application it might be possible, but I am not sure.  

Attorney DV TRO Success in Multiple Cases

Not so typical DV TRO cases are not easy to accomplish, mostly because people don't understand
how they can operate. A DV TRO is much more complicated that it appears, despite people filing them inappropriately.

In our cases, we specifically explore opportunities for a DV TRO case when facts have already taken place, and we cannot get rid of what has already happened, BUT we still need to do something to preserve the client's rights. This may sound obvious/easy to do, but it is not.

The law re DV TROs (domestic violence temporary restraining orders) was created basically because mostly women were forced to flee their own homes due to abuse of some type. [Men can be victims as well but it is usually mostly women..]  Since abuse can mean a lot of things, women who have left their own homes for various reasons often are not sure what to do or where they can go. However, under the CA Penal Code, domestic violence is defined as intentionally or recklessly causing or attempting to cause bodily injury, or placing another person in reasonable apprehension of imminent serious bodily injury to himself or herself, or to another.

------>  The Domestic Violence Prevention Act (Family Code Section 6200 et seq)-- which we call the DV TRO for short--- is much different than the definition under the CA Penal Code. In fact, the DV TRO specifically mentions sections of the CA Family Code (such as FC6320, 6203(a), FC6203(b).

The DV TRO data, Domestic Violence Prevention Act, (FC Section 6200 et seq)-- is often used by pro se litigants, sometimes inappropriately. Abuse is NOT limited to actual infliction of physical injury or assault. We have seen the DV TRO used inappropriately in some cases, and in others, the clients have never filed a DV TRO because they were too afraid.

Different Approach Methods for Various Cases in DV TRO by Attorney

A few examples..........
Female was formerly abused by the ex boyfriend while living together in another state.  She required medical attention and charges were filed against the ex.  She moved to CA with her two dogs, the ex attempted to continue harassing her, by filing a civil lawsuit re the dogs. [Attorney does animal law and has wide history of examining animal law cases both state and federal..]

Victim has PTSD from the former domestic violence in the other state; the continued following by the ex, to sue her in state of CA was a pattern of harassment, among other things...We filed a DV TRO for her, it was granted, and the ex did not get any of the dogs. Further, the ex's lawsuit was tossed after victim was advised to file in Federal Court and obtained a stay, and that dog case was then dead in the water. This was not in Butte County, but in Northern CA about 55 miles from Butte.

Female was formerly abused physically by the ex, the ex was not charged, but was arrested. She was too afraid to file a DV TRO.

After female left the ex, a prior situation involving potential molest by a family member v another family member arose....the victim family member was living with the ex. We filed the DV TRO and included the victim family member, to prohibit the ex from getting the victim family member back into his home.
This resulted in a CSD (child services) investigation.which was decided by the court at what is known as VIP, which is not mediation, but a process usually used for agreements in custody. Since judge sent the case there, knowing there was a DV TRO filed, the DV TRO was left in place and continued to at least the end of the investigation.  It is a dicey decision to contact CSD if you do not have certain evidence/facts/witnesses, and normally an attorney should be consulted first, unless situation is outright obvious or evidence will be destroyed, or unless there is an obvious 911 situation. Had this not been done, as stated above, it would have created many loopholes in the domestic divorce case. At least this way the minor child did not have to go to CPS nor back to the ex's home.

Female/minor child arrived in CA on a one way ticket from another state, where female had been the subject of domestic violence by the ex and his family. We filed a DV TRO against the out of state ex, because we realized that if there was nothing to stop him, he would come to CA and take the child.

Under cases which involve various legal filings in two states, the UCCJEA and the states' UCCJEA apply. Usually in those cases, the judges will confer to determine the jurisdiction for the case. Each side may believe their "state" should be used for the case. These scenarios can be a little involved, and it is not the attorneys that ultimately decide the jurisdiction. However, we are hoping in our case that the out of state judge will urge the CA judge to keep our case here. Reason being is that when one party sends the other party to go away with a one way ticket, then ends up filing a divorce and
demands return of the child to the other state, while the female in CA has already been granted a one year DV TRO--- why should the judge in the 2nd state want the female to go back to the abuser in the 2nd state when there is a new DV TRO in the first state (CA)?  We will see what happens in several weeks. The ex did file a "response" to the DV TRO in CA but he did not object otherwise on the record when the one year DV TRO was granted. Plausibly, the one year grant included the temporary custody of the minor child as requested, [even if Judge couldn't make a custody order, since the home state was the other state, not CA.] We assume that returning the child would have to be done by the ex in the other state; so far, Judge in the other state, did not order that the Mother or child be returned to the original state (which is not CA.)

We get various unusual cases that are candidates for DV TRO filing. We expect to handle two more DV TRO cases shortly. Most attorneys breeze over this because they limit the scenarios to certain aspects. In our background of meeting people, we have found that the DV TRO definitely has limits but when abuse is present, and other evidence is there, the DV TRO may be appropriate.

Contact Chico attorney C. Chan today 530.359,8810 if you believe you have a DV TRO case. We would be happy to talk with you about the case. Most affordable attorney rates!

Thursday, August 16, 2018

The Biggest Compliment....

Tina Taylor
a day ago
I spent five years embroiled in a highly contentious divorce in which I lost everything. As well, I was attacked by my ex-husband during that divorce, leaving me disabled and unable to work. My attorney did nothing to address this violence and in fact colluded with the other parties counsel. Judicial misconduct also took place in this case.
Obviously, this has left me in a difficult situation both legally and financially. I've spent the better part of a year searching for legal help with no luck whatsoever......... until I called Ms. Chan. Although she is not able to take my case, do to the county where it took place, she actually talked with me.
Not only did she speak with me for more than a few minutes sharing useful information with me, she did so pleasantly, willingly and for no charge. If that wasn't already more than kind and generous, she phoned me a week later giving me the address of a website that has proved extremely helpful.
Ms. Chan's moral principles and ethics are admirable, refreshing, and deserving of respect! Additionally, I read about Ms. Chan's advocacy for animals in her bio and in my opinion, that earns her extra points as a responsible attorney and a fine human being

Attorney posts this above---because:

(a) it is true
(b) things like this situation are more common than people realize
(c) Lassen County is definitely corrupt

(d) attorney herein has experience in family law, civil cases, criminal defense, bankruptcy, animal law, and probably a little more.....and even if attorney does not know the answer (which happens at  times)-- attorney is always willing to try and find out the answer....
(e) attorney believes that all clients appreciate it when attorney treats them like people, just normal everyday people, with common courtesy

(f) attorney believes that many clients are not treated very well by many attorneys generally
(g)  attorney believes that law school does not prepare attorneys to handle people at all, and that many attorneys simply believe they are too high on the chain, and must talk down to people
(h)  attorney doesn't believe that winning is everything in all cases, but for many of the cases, it is crucial.

 Last but not least, attorney has been involved in animal law cases and related issues, and has what would be considered a very high degree of knowledge in animal law issues, including breed specific legislation, dangerous dogs, personal injuries involving dogs/animals, negligence involving animals, animal control/animals, seizures, illegal seizures, humane society groups, fraud by alleged "humane" non profits [good,bad,sued or fake],  lawsuits involving animal control/animals/owners, replevin or writ of possession, abandonment/fines, rescue animals/groups [bona fide/not] issues of rational basis/health/welfare/safety, improper application of the BCS method used to convict owners, constitutional law published cases on First Amendment involving animals; issues involving service animals, therapy and emotional assist animals, vet negligence, animal abuse (or claimed abuse), penalties for alleged abuse or convictions, and more.   

Monday, August 13, 2018

Google Wants Us to Pay for Ads? As if they Weren't already $$$$$

Google's entire format for businesses changed after they implemented their https deal apparently.....

But since attorney has previously been physically attacked inside a Federal Courthouse [during animal law litigation, go figure..] it is not surprising to find  attorney's site or personal data is the victim of hacking. It has already happened, so it's not really new.  



Wednesday, August 8, 2018

Attorney Online

Attorney guarantees the most affordable fees. If you find a better rate attorney can likely
meet the rate as long as it is not outrageous and the other attorney has at least twenty years
of doing family law. ** Just as one example, in a case that took over a year, the opposing attorney was paid over $12,700 (overbilled, actually..) and attorney herein was paid $2,900. Attorney takes cases for one basic reason, and that is to produce a desired result.

Jun 25, 2018 -  - Butte County Family Law Attorney C. Chan, Esq. 530.359.8810 ... You should consult a qualified attorney to obtain accurate legal information ...

C + H* Attorneys Chico, CA 530.359.8810 : Attorney Information C ...

Aug 7, 2017 - Chico Family Law Attorney C. Chan 20+ Years 530.359.8810 .... Many attorneys dislikefamily law in its entirety due to the negativity associated ...

CHICO Family Law Attorney C. Chan, Esq. 530.359.8810: December ...

Dec 3, 2014 - 123 Chico Family Law Attorney 530.359.8810 Affordable  Custody Lawyers - Looking For Divorce/Family Lawyers??.


Aug 16, 2018 - https://affordablefamilylawattorneychico.blogspot.com/ ( Phone is on this link online/references) Attorney C. Chan Â Family Law Attorney, ...

Tuesday, August 7, 2018

Affordable Family Law Attorney+ Reviews C. Chan Chico, Placer, Sacramento

Family Law: What Type of Attorney Do You Really Need?

Attorney Reviews:  https://tinyurl.com/ydg6z52f

Wednesday, August 1, 2018

BEWARE:  WARNING.................


If you have any issue in divorce,  involving a property like a house, which is under water, absolutely do NOT let any officer of the court (Judge, commissioner,etc.) GIVE your house to the other party if you paid big cash down--- unless you don't want the house at all....ever.   Get help fast from a family law attorney who has handled these cases as it appears that some in Butte County don't understand how to handle this.

There is a lot written about reimbursements in CA family law cases, and some very messy litigation in the published cases. Typically, a CA FC2640 reimbursement http://codes.findlaw.com/ca/family-code/fam-sect-2640.html
arises when spouses  to the dissolution have spent their separate property money and then went in/out and out/in and changed things such that it's difficult to say who owned what, when, where, and how?

In some instances, each party claims reimbursement. Also note that reimbursement is not automatic if there are issues involving prior marriage, prior title changes, prior refinancing, or any changes to title, or removing people from title.  Further, evidence of someone writing a check for improvements, for example,  is generally not sufficient at all to prove tracing of payments, especially if the one paying had multiple accounts, commingled accounts, and was married, divorced, remarried, and then divorced again.

When a property is now "under water" meaning little to no equity, but one spouse had paid hard CASH and bought the property with $150,000 cash down---should that property (with no equity) just be given to the OTHER party?

The correct answer is usually NO.
But much of the published cases have divorces where there are other items and property so the Court can try and apportion the division.

Family Code 2640 has a provision (b) which says at the end,.."the amount reimbursed shall be without interest or adjustment for change in monetary values and may not exceed the net value of the property at the time of the division."  

Would that mean --- that anyone who paid cash for an asset in their name alone, where the asset was currently worth less than they paid at divorce trial (think CA 2007-to the rock bottom of real estate sales/foreclosures) --  that this means Judge should just give the asset (a house) away to the other spouse whose name was NEVER even on the house, it was not held in joint tenancy, there was no change to the title ever during the marriage, and the other spouse didn't even work to boot--the one that was GIVEN the house???  HELL NO!!!!!!  There is no way in the world that using the phrase in (b) above should cause one party's traceable asset to simply be GIVEN AWAY to the other person.

The division should be close to equal BUT when title was clearly held only in one name and there is no equity,  the person who owned the house should have been given the house (that party could re-finance or use a government program to change the mortgage!!)
A huge error like this where the FC2640 reimbursement was not possible due to no equity--but yet the Judge gave that very property to the spouse---this is an abuse of discrection.

We aren't kidding here--there is an officer of the Court in Butte County that simply gave away the house to the person that wasn't on title and was on disability and couldn't afford to pay for the house anyway?  And the person who OWNED the house had the separate property simply TAKEN from her?  and given to the other spouse????

Never in a million years should this ever, ever, ever happen. Never. Especially when the documents for trial clearly indicated that such property was a separate property belonging to the spouse that put the cash down.

This is a BIG warning to family law litigants that are pro se-- if you have ANY separate property that has any value, even if under water, get help right away!!