This is one of the most commonly seen issues around. And apparently this is the case throughout the entire state of California. Further, it is extremely common now to find parents and family with various afflictions, including mental, emotional, behavioral, etc. In turn, this obviously will affect the kids, extended family, and more.
One of the worst things that attorney sees, and is always surprised each time--is finding that less than half of clients seen-- actually get on some type of program for their mental or emotional issues.
If that was done, it would lessen the effects that travel down to the kids. But when the parent's try and take care of their own issues, rather than pretending they do not exist, it becomes much easier to work with the kids, whether they have any issues or not.
Another very very common scenario is for each parent to blame the other parent. Of course some of that is likely true, but not every set of parents can actually do "co-parenting" ....and attorney believes that parents with issues mentioned above, may not work well in "co-parenting" set ups.
Attorney believes that "co-parenting" assumes that there are not major issues with the parents. But when there are some huge issues with a parent (or both)-- it is highly unlikely that co-parenting will work smoothly simply because the very nature of cooperation is assumed, and quite obviously parents themselves who have issues are not likely to stick with cooperation.
If such parents can prove they can do it, that is one thing, but inevitably usually what happens is, one parent starts taking advantage of the other parent. In other words, there are many parents that believe they should stay together for the sake of the kids.
What they don't realize is the harm they do to the kids when they do not parent the kids successfully?
"Fixing" your custody order might require a re-work of whatever you have in order to FIX it!
Monday, November 19, 2018
Saturday, November 17, 2018
Could it possibly be, just that easy, after the huge fires in Sonoma several years ago, where houses were simply decimated much like in the local fire, and now both Northern CA (Paradise, et al) and Malibu, Southern CA, just "happened" to catch on fire, near the same time? And that those 3 areas all involve CA land that allegedly will be needed or used for--- some high speed train system that isn't built?
But only in Butte County, not only does the death toll likely EXCEED 88 victims, but a town is practically wiped out all in one fell swoop, and even with a planned "exit" strategy [which was to alleviate mass exodus/thus avoid harm in theory, by having "named zones like high pines or low pines, etc.] --- we are led to believe, by reading the newspapers and online reports--- that it [the fire]-- was due to high winds and whatever else that many claim involve PGE??? -- because the winds were "too" high and the people supposedly just not savvy enough or able enough to run fast, or to figure out why or how or IF they needed to evacuate??? Because, wasn't there already a PLAN for orderly evacuation? and NO evacuation notice was given to the majority?
Well, let me be just one person to tell everyone just how confusing it was, for me anyway, to figure out that there even WAS a fire at all on November 8, 2018??? Y'all can call me an idiot, but I have been through fires in the past.......read on........
I went outside around 0815am, only by chance, and then noticed that 3/4 of the sky was blue--BUT I saw a very puffy cloud formation that had what appeared to be pink/yellow tones as well?
Now I have been through 3 fires before, so it's not like I have not seen fires or not been involved in an evacuation. But this didn't look, smell, or appear to be a fire right off to me........and it was actually very pretty--it appeared to be pink and yellow (not red and black) so I even took pictures of the puffy clouds? No joke!! There was no black smoke, no hint of burning, nothing but the clouds--- but only in one area? There was no robo evacuation call, nothing. The neighborhood was quiet, no one was seen outside........
I then went inside and called a friend who always knows the weather, and asked him if by any chance, if there was a fire, and if there was, why he hadn't called me [he would definitely call me right away...] He yells into the phone RUN YOU GOT 10 MINUTES TO GET THE HELL OUT!!!
...and the reason he knew there was a fire, was because outside his front door a few miles away, he apparently SAW the huge pillars of smoke coming from one side of the ridge. and he saw RED.
For anyone that hasn't read or seen the U-Tube videos on DEW (directed energy weapons)
here's small example...you be the judge. There are always people that believe the government is hardly concerned for the people, and there is some truth to that in all government.
The Congressional record on DEW:
S.2778 - 114th Congress (2015-2016): Directed Energy Weapon ...
Apr 12, 2016 - Summary of S.2778 - 114th Congress (2015-2016): Directed Energy Weapon Systems Acquisition Act of 2016.
usa | Must include: usa
Report to Congress on Army Directed Energy Weapons - USNI News
Feb 21, 2018 - The U.S. military has a long and complicated history in developing directed energy (DE)weapons. Many past efforts have failed for a variety of ...
record | Must include: record
Directed Energy Weapon Systems Acquisition Act of 2016 (2016 ...
Apr 12, 2016 - In GovTrack.us, a database of bills in the U.S. Congress. ... acquisition of directed energy weapons systems by the Department of Defense, and ...
Feb 12, 2018 - U.S. Army Weapons-Related Directed Energy (DE) Programs ... Potential issues forCongress include the following: ...... 33 The Defense Acquisition University defines a Program of Recordas a program that is funded ...
Nov 8, 2011 - “The substantial backlog at the National Archives and Records ... A new U.S. Air Force policy directive on “Directed Energy Weapons” specifies that ... A new report from the CongressionalResearch Service considers the use ...